To Serve is To Live

What’s the Point? (No, Seriously. What Is the Point?)

At some point, we’ve all stood in the shower, stared off into the void (or the shampoo bottle), and asked the big question:
“What’s the point of all this?”

Like, really. What’s the point of working? Of meal prepping chicken and rice like we’re training for the Olympics when the only race we’re running is to beat traffic? What’s the point of going to the gym, squeezing into shirts that are a little too tight (okay, maybe that’s just me), and checking credit scores like its the weather?

Asking “what’s the point?” is not a crisis—it’s actually a solid philosophical question, right up there with “Is cereal a form of soup?” and “Do dogs like me as much as I think they do?”

But seriously—what happens after you reach the goals?
You made the money. Lost the weight. Landed the promotion that requires 60 hours a week… which now requires 70 to maintain (and a personal assistant, a neck brace, and maybe a therapist-I know a good one). You bought the car. Paid off the student loans. Traveled to Italy and ate pasta that made those tight shirts even tighter in a different way. You’ve done The Things.

And then what?

At 25, I had this little existential meltdown (I think it’s called a quarter-life crisis). I realized I might not become a millionaire—despite my mother assuring me I could be anything I wanted to be, including the world-renowned biochemist I aspired to become after watching Outbreak at age nine. Thanks Dustin Hoffman.

I mean, sure, buying those new shoes felt good. And yes, the compliments on the designer outfit were nice—until I realized I still felt kind of… empty. Not sad, not broken. Just unsettled.

Now, some people find meaning in marathons, psychedelics, or finishing every episode of The Office (again). Others chase after this mysterious thing called “existential achievement” like it’s a Pokémon. And for many, the couch and a rerun of Seinfeld is more than enough—and hey, no shame if you’re still riding that DVD life.

But if you’re one of the curious ones—the ones who can’t shake the “What’s the point?” question no matter how many productivity podcasts or oat milk lattes you consume—then maybe it’s time to stop asking what the point is, and start asking why you’re even here.

Not to be dramatic, but… why do you exist? What was the reason for you being created in the first place?

If you ask an atheist, they might say we’re just floating on a rock, existing until we don’t—nothing more, nothing less. Which is philosophically interesting but doesn’t help you get out of bed on a Monday. (No offense, atheists—but seriously, how do you guys do it?)

Personally, I believe there’s a Creator—a higher Being who loves us into existence—and that gives me meaning. That awful Monday meeting? Purpose. That toddler tantrum in Target? Spiritual growth. That parking ticket? A lesson in patience.

Because if love is real, and God is love, then you are loved—on purpose. Not randomly, not accidentally. And that changes everything.

Achievements are fine. Financial freedom is lovely (at least I’ve heard that). But none of it will satisfy the soul. Not fully. Not for long.

So maybe the real question isn’t “What’s the point?”
It’s: “What am I here for?”
And “How can I live the most valuable life with the time I’ve got?”

If you start there, even the tight shirts start to make a little more sense.

Comments

8 responses to “To Serve is To Live”

  1. Archon's Den Avatar

    Interesting and productive questions…. but they can be both asked and answered, without stuffing God into the cracks. 😳

    Like

    1. Luke Meier Avatar

      You are correct. They can be asked at a strictly humanistic and psychological level. I see people attempt and I work with them on that attempt whether they believe or not. Do some people come up with stuff that works for them? Sure. It’s just tough to ask the questions without acknowledging Spirituality and Soul which then provokes one’s view of creation, humans, time, etc.

      Like

      1. Archon's Den Avatar

        Two delightfully vague and tenuous terms whose definitions can be made to mean anything, without evidence, but usually mean desperation and delusion. 😮

        Like

      2. Luke Meier Avatar

        Well, from my worldview to live disconnected from God, the Creator of man made in their image, is a delusion, yes. I believe people live in delusions all the time, and to my point made in the post, I seriously do not know how people do it, without a connection to God as a guide for life. Even when I don’t live as I should, or sin, in my view, it’s still in relationship to a God who loves me and wants good things for me. Without that, what am I? What do I have to look forward to after my brief stint on this beautiful planet?

        Like

  2. clubschadenfreude Avatar

    No evidence for any god, and humans give themselvse and other purpose. There needs to be no magic “reason” we exist. “If you ask an atheist, they might say we’re just floating on a rock, existing until we don’t—nothing more, nothing less. Which is philosophically interesting but doesn’t help you get out of bed on a Monday. (No offense, atheists—but seriously, how do you guys do it?)”because the vast majority of us aren’t nihilists like theists try to claim we are. That’s how *we* do it, by not claiming some god cares about us and only us, ignoring the problems in the world. We get up to make a difference. Love is indeed real. No need for any god to know that or to somehow make it real. “It’s: “What am I here for?”And “How can I live the most valuable life with the time I’ve got?”“yep, we have one life, no afterlife, just a chance to make a difference, or not, as we choose.

    Like

    1. Luke Meier Avatar

      I appreciate taking the time to comment. I meant that. In this world where there’s a thousand things you could read, you read some of mine and that’s pretty cool. I see what you’re saying and obviously we could get into what you see versus what I see and both are going to be each other’s own experience. My struggle remains-not seeing how one can stay motivated to make the temporary things of this world pleasant or “loving” as you say without at some point finding it all meaningless. Also, concepts like “love” are interesting when I attempt to remove a God who Scripture says is love, gives love, and lets us choose to love or not through Him, and see how a concept like “love” is even possible without it first having been given to us.

      Like

      1. clubschadenfreude Avatar

        Luke, all you seem to have is an argument from personal ignorance. That you personally can’t grasp how someone can have meaning without your god doesn’t mean that it does not happen. And the fact that you can’ show your god to merely exists is quite the problem for you.

        Your bible claims your god is love, but it proceeds to show that is not the case. This god can’t even come up to the half-decent description of love in 1 Corinthians. It gives no love, and no one needs it to love someone else.

        You simply assume that your god gave us love, when that is entirely baseless. It’s like the claim that your god gave humans morality. Even your bible says that is wrong, since Eve took it.

        Like

  3. Luke Meier Avatar

    Well we have two different perspectives on our understanding of the what Scripture says for sure. Eve “taking” is an interesting concept for one. But, as is with atheist your view exists as a negative to Gods existence. If God were not real, would you have to have a group to prove it? Or would it just be the way of things?

    Again, and sadly, it just feels as though your need to comment on my post the fact that you disagree with it, is from a negative view versus that of my positive. It’s Pascals Wager here, what does one have to lose by living and attributing good to a God who loves and provides and be wrong at the end that He doesn’t, rather than to live as though He doesn’t and then be wrong and He does? Again, this view provides a sadness in me and very little hope of good things is all I’m saying. But, as is with these sorts of topics, there is no convincing either side, as we will both just become all the more reinforced on our own view in defending it.

    I have many things to say, but I just am not the sort of debater who is good with these sorts of things. I can only be and represent what I believe in action which is one’s experience with me, which I cannot say otherwise it would be pompous and not action. So, my best defense to what you are saying and will say is in my actions, not words.

    Like

Leave a comment